GRAPH DATABASE BENCHMARK REPORT
This benchmark compares TigerGraph to Neo4j, Amazon Neptune, JanusGraph and ArangoDB in the following categories:
Queries: For 2-hop path queries, TigerGraph is 40x to 337x faster than other graph databases.
Storage: When comparing storage requirements for the same raw data, other graph databases need 5x to 13x more disk space compared to TigerGraph.
Loading: TigerGraph loads data 1.8x to 58x faster than other graph databases.
Scale: TigerGraph scales almost linearly with additional machines, achieving 6.7x speedup with 8 machines for the computationally intensive PageRank algorithm. Neo4j and Amazon Neptune cannot partition a graph across multiple machines for the versions tested, thus could not be tested for this part.
Click below for the benchmark summary or download the full report.